Socialize

Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston!

Boston – National Guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed by elements of a Para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.

Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement.

Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.

The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons.

Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms.

One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”

Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.

During a tense standoff in the Lexington town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.

Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange.

Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces over matched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.

Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops.

Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as “ringleaders” of the extremist faction, remain at large.

And this fellow Americans, is how the American Revolution began, April 20, 1775.

signing_of_the_declaration_of_independenceOn July 4th, 1776 these same extremists signed the Declaration of Independence, pledging to each other and their countrymen their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. Many of them lost everything, including their families and their lives over the course of the next few years.

Lest we forget…

 

 

 

Let us not forget!

Comments

comments

281 Responses to Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston!

  1. Zenmaster Reply

    March 11, 2014 at 12:36 am

    Fake old story… this website needs to be shut down

    • MOman Reply

      March 11, 2014 at 10:48 am

      while it might not be exactly historically accurate, it is close enough, or did you not read the April 20th 1775?

      This is doctored to sound like it is current journalism with things like “radical right-wing tax protest movement” the point is to make you think critically and it uses a historical precedence to do so, to dismiss it so easily is both foolish and naïve.

      The problem with our current government is the frog in the pot syndrome, drop it in boiling water, it will jump out, turn up the heat slowly, and it will stay until it dies. this is exactly what they are doing, slowly implementing law until it reaches “normalcy” and is accepted socially, then they introduce another law and another law in the same fashion, until all the rights are stripped away.

      either wake up and realize the pot is at hot and right before boiling and die on your feet a free man, or lay down in the mass grave during the genocide similar to what Russia did and accept your fate already dead.

  2. jason uzi romine Reply

    March 10, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    **** this government the 2nd amendment allows us to bear arms to protect our selves and our families does not say what kind of weapons we as the people are allowed to have as responsible people… Go find the illegal ones you crack heads!!!

  3. Puckhead1296 Reply

    March 9, 2014 at 8:57 pm

    I think the politicians that put these officers and military at risk should be on the front line asking for citizens to hand over their weapons. A well armed militia will guaranty that our government does not turn is not ruled by a tyrant. Rest in Peace all who parishes in this skirmish.

  4. Patriot Scott Reply

    March 9, 2014 at 12:47 pm

    When I was living in California a few years ago, I wrote a letter to my then Congressman regarding freedom of Speech rights being violated relating to Christian radio being subjected to FCC banning. Warning the powers that be to be prepared for a common uprising if our God-given inalienable rights were violated. The said Congressman returned my letter with a rather nasty response, but the point was made. Long live The Declaration of Independence; 1776 number 2! I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Truth in the Bible! The only means of Salvation for our fallen natures, and the principle upon which our Nation exists to present His ultimate truth.

  5. Pingback: Interesting development in the CT gun seizure debacle! - Page 2

  6. Pingback: ‘My Peace I Give Unto You’: Baptist Church Giving Away ‘Free AR-15′ | The New Civil Rights Movement

  7. Pingback: 72 Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation in Boston

  8. Pingback: Anonymous Warning to America: USD Collapse, Martial Law, FEMA Camps, and RFIDs | Anonymous on the Reptilian Illuminati

  9. dane Reply

    January 1, 2014 at 8:32 pm

    To many people would LOVE TO KNEEL BEFORE OBAMA!

    • Wayne Caviness Reply

      March 11, 2014 at 9:05 pm

      Yep,
      I agree and most of them will give up their guns if asked to do so. The ones that don’t shiver at the sight of gun that is.

      I honestly don’t think it’s going to this simple when and if it all breaks loose. We can only pray that it doesn’t come to this.

      If it does, I know where I stand. I gladly served my country for 8 years and my oath didn’t end with my EAS. I’ve learned a lot since then about the wars that our vets have been fighting for in the name of so called Democracy and Freedom. I think a lot of people have.

      What is really disappointing, is when I see how our vets are treated by our government. It really urks me when I see the pics of our vets with the message that Freedom doesn’t come free. I understand they are trying to show respect and support for our troops.Thing is responsibility lays not only on the shoulders of our troops, but every redblooded American.

  10. Pingback: 72 killed resisting Gun Registration - Gun and Game - Gun Forum

  11. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! | Direitas Já!

  12. Leonardo davinci Reply

    December 10, 2013 at 1:47 am

    Mr. metal moron…u better go back to school…Those were military planes with war heads in them…The buildings main beams were cut with thermite at sub ground levels…Next a few days a man insured both 1&2 for a great sum, oh & get this he also Owned #7…All 3 bldgs. were Rigged with a series of well placed explosives…When the towers started to fall 1&2 the explosives were detonated u could see the explosions…After the bldgs. fell a call was made to the owner of bldg. #7 and he gave the order to bring it down…Do your history, the material is available on the net…As for our Gov. it’s a dog & pony show…For the most part our underground movement is a force to be feared by the Gov. Along with ordinary citizens not to doubt…America is in for some hard times but we will prevail…All u SHEEPLE time to get your crap together or they have places ready for u…As to the 50.000.russian troops they really are here…here where I live a lot of military and police interaction is happening as well as air action is happening as well…Don’t think it’s not happening, it’s right at our door step…If you want this country to survive everyone has to do their part…Every man & woman needs to be armed…I mean EVERYONE even the ones with tarnished backgrounds for they are a part of AMERICA also & are another force that we are going to need…Also getting back to bldg. #1&2 along with the pentagon…Vital records were stored at points of impact…These were records proving about corruption and mostly about missing $…Let me state again these were all really highly explosive weapons…Get this the two planes that supposedly hit the towers are still in use today…On the day of 1&2 going down all the military in the area were out on an operation practicing a mock attack of the towers…How convent…The air support left behind to protect everyone were NOT ARMED…Kind of CRAZY don’t u think???…How many more lies are we going to have dumped on us before we react???…

  13. William Kostric Reply

    December 8, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    Do the ongoing weapon confiscations disturb you? They should. What can you do? Find out here.

    http://freestateproject.org/fsn42

  14. Furious STLWC Webmst (@stlwc) Reply

    December 8, 2013 at 12:33 pm

    Another fake news site devoid of humor that will never live up to The Onion.

  15. Pingback: Gun confiscations underway in NYC?

  16. James B Goodherb Reply

    December 7, 2013 at 8:57 pm

    Obama is the enemy. He is just a pawn. The ones he speaks foe are the ones we must attack. They’re communists with the knowlege to overthrough us using ppropaganda. Kennedy and lincoln warned us about these people and their intensions. I hope everyone is prepared for war. As far as people in the armed forces your sacrifices and service to the country we appreciate you. If you are not with us then ny definition you are against us. It seems as if americans have to fight for our freedom yet again.

  17. Jenna Dodson Reply

    December 7, 2013 at 7:12 pm

    BOTTOM LINE!!!! KEEP COLLECTING YOUR AMMO, CUZ TRUST AND BELIEVE IT’LL BE HERE BEFORE U THINK IT WILL

  18. Bob Whittinghill Reply

    December 7, 2013 at 5:44 pm

    I think You must See This Movie
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgspMlPP7bA

  19. Pingback: 72 Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation in Boston | 2012 The Big Picture

  20. Pingback: 72 Tea Party Patriots Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation In Boston | Real Science

  21. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston!

  22. Pingback: The Armed CitizenSeventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston | armed citizen

  23. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston!

  24. fred Reply

    December 5, 2013 at 11:28 pm

    GUN NUTS….listen closely…THEY ARE NOT, NOR WILL THEY EVER TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY. The only real thing they wanted was expanded background checks…which everyone wanted, except a few nut jobs (these are the same nuts that think marriage equality means we will eventually marry dogs and children). HOWEVER gun background checks and other feel good laws will do nothing for gun violence. Expanded mental health care and anti-violence education(this especially includes the police!) is the answer to less gun crime and violence.

    • TAC Admin Reply

      December 6, 2013 at 9:36 am

      There already are background checks. I’ve never purchased a firearm without having one, my first being a shotgun in 1990. I’ve had a background check performed at a gun show as well. I’ve been in the military for 18 years, and if I was to PCS to Ft Drum, NY I would have to sell half of my firearms or have them stored in another state. Is that due to increased background checks?

    • RC Reply

      December 7, 2013 at 6:12 pm

      YOUR AN IDIOT THE WHOLE THING WAS OVER GUN CONFISCATION WHICH MEANS TAKING THE GUNS.

    • Jenna Dodson Reply

      December 7, 2013 at 7:15 pm

      RIGHT!!! I TAKE IT YOUR A COP?

    • Sailez Reply

      December 20, 2013 at 9:24 am

      Though I basically agree with you, the premise that better mental health care will alleviate violence begs the question: Do we have an inordinate proportion of crazies in this country? Similar events are extremely rare to non existent in countries with stringent gun laws. It is the easy availability of insanely potent weaponry that allows for the massacres we experience. Personally, I am in the market for a few surface to air missiles as I am seriously worried about the North Koreans and the Iranis. I have publicly declared my domicile a nuclear free zone!

    • Will Reply

      July 1, 2016 at 7:15 pm

      First door to door confuscation have all ready happened in many cities, some several times. Chicago for example when they banned hand guns did several door to search and seizures. Only to have the ban over turned by the supreme court many years latter, but that did nothing to help those who suffered at the hands of tyrany.

      Secound the federal goverment has all ready studied how best to handle confiscations. It would be done using state and local law enforcement in phases. This to hopefuly prevent a sudden revolt. If they don’t have plans to do it why have they studied the least messest way to do it?

  25. Pingback: Deaths Follow Attempted Firearms Confiscation

  26. yea right Reply

    December 5, 2013 at 12:36 pm

    There are only three skyscrappers that have fallin from a fire..
    And all three were on 911. The empire state building was even hit by an airplane and still stands to this day but yea sure those planes took down the world trade center towers and a another building that was only on fire in complete uniform formation. Yea i believe that… no not now not ever and u spouting that you know about mathmematics and physics and so on without being able to say where u receved said knowlage makes you hard to believe.

  27. Rosa Osuere Reply

    December 4, 2013 at 10:26 pm

    jayus ,mary and the we donkey when yer law was passed you could carry arms it was when you where robbing the native indian of their land ,cowboys and injuns ..we our now in this century and the world has moved on ,but not ye all good boys ,,you put guns before all else ,how many kids have to die before ye all get it

    • Kim Reply

      December 7, 2013 at 6:09 pm

      So, the Founding Fathers’ concern about Americans being able to protect themselves from enemies within, such as criminals, crazy people, and tyrannical government is passé because everyone is so evolved that we are all now angels??? No evil remains in the world to defend ourselves against, right? You are dangerously naïve and foolish.

      • Ive lived in houses older than america Reply

        December 9, 2013 at 6:11 am

        Jeeez… you ‘mericans and yer guns! You really, really just don’t get it at all do you? The world has moved on from gun-toting cowboy days… but you guys?… still gun-toting, short-sighted, ‘It;s our goddam right’ cowboys… you can try and justify it anyway you want, but most of the rest of the world just thinks it’s pathetic. You need to stop thinking you are the world’s greatest nation (you’re not), and start sorting your own country’s (gun) problems out instead of trying to play at ‘World Police’…. jeeez

    • Will Reply

      July 1, 2016 at 7:27 pm

      The right was written to prevent future tyrany. If you bothered to educate your self regarding the language used, and the writings of those who penned these rights in the first place you would understand this. Yes they even accounted fir the fact technology would far out surpassed what they had at the time. It has nothing to do with hunting,or self defense from a burgler. It has every thing to with the citizen being the last and most powerful check and balance to the eventual coruption of the goverment. They understood better then most today that over decades all levels of our goverment would leap at any chance to take more power even by means of coruption. Poket knives wont help deter tyrany. Most of the founding fathers were in agreence that the federal goverment needed to fear potential violent revolt to prevent this coruption as long as possible. Some many today falsely think the federal goverment would never violate our rights, but by your very thinking that just due to the right being written over 200 years ago that it has no merit, shows how many are willing to violate these rights. They start with one then procede to the others with no end site. For that matter this line of thinking makes the right to vote obsolete. After all it was written at the same time. The age of the right has no bearing on it’s validity.

  28. Pingback: Harken back

  29. Dave Reply

    December 4, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    You voted these people into office, now live with your mistakes….or get rid of them!

  30. In the world of information, ignorance is a choice Reply

    December 4, 2013 at 1:38 pm

    I’m an engineering student, and I don’t know numbers to tell you that a third world country with limiting everything somehow devise this plan and successfully executed it smells fishy. And weren’t people acting the same what you are about the Cuban Missile Crisis? Aren’t there documents PROVING the US government had intend of executing false flag operations so they could convince American people whatever they needed to in order to meet their agenda? As someone who know math and shit, you should also take history into account. They had plans in the 70s to do exactly what happened in 9/11. You’re right to say it was terrorists, I don’t think you know who the terrorists are.

  31. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! | a12iggymom's Blog

  32. Rough Men Reply

    December 3, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    “We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.” G.O.

    COME TRY AND TAKE MY GUNS AWAY! THOSE THAT DO WILL FIND THE TRUTH BEHIND THE ABOVE QUOTE

  33. Noni Reply

    December 2, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    Good satire.

  34. Bob Norman Reply

    December 2, 2013 at 10:03 pm

    there is no way this would happen today, because today they would use drones against us!!!

  35. Nunya Reply

    November 29, 2013 at 6:00 pm

    Who sanctioned the repost of this article from July and for what purpose? We are( for the most part) logical, educated, law abiding citizens that have a valid reason for fearing what is going on in America. Yellow journalism? Directive from the self-centered, overpaid sanctimonious government employees in Washington DC?? This is moronic banter to say the least. I am a licensed weapon carrier and do it for my families safety. It is a sad statement that America has come to this level.

  36. Kevin De Vos Reply

    November 27, 2013 at 1:44 am

    I’ve read a lot of the posts and for some they can’t seem to see the large picture most people see, rights are easy to take away if you erode them little by little, liberals are under course with their lock step agenda and once you learn some history, you can see how a Republic was made, by sacrifice. The fringe folks (Liberals) are only tolerated because we wan’t to be a free society, that doesn’t mean I’ll embrace homosexuals or men who want to marry children, they need help, that’s it.
    In the past the people knew how to ENSURE the Republic was preserved, by equally arming each citizen, this would make politicians think twice each time they dreamed up some idea or imposition. I’ve gone to 2 wars as an Infantryman and I know what it is to be free, I was willing to put my butt on the line to defend it and it’s idea, I encourage all liberals to do the same.
    Stand and be counted means something to me, never doing the minimal, do what’s required damned the consequence.

  37. Pingback: Seventy-two Killed Resisting Gun Confiscation in Boston | Jericho777's Blog

  38. patroit and proud of our befoere obama country Reply

    October 25, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    Evidently some of the people commenting on this site do not keep up with the latest news How about the police confiscating guns from people without cause in several of our cities? What about the man that had a concealed permit and was arrested and had his gun taken away in another city because of their illegal and UN-Constitutional laws? Kalifornia is banning guns as we communicate about this. Get you heads out of your rear ends before it is too late. It is not about gun control. It is about prevent the citizens from defending our country from tyranny. Look at all of the UN-Constitutional things the prez has done while congress kisses his ars! Tyranny is very close and must b stopped at all costs!!

  39. HB Fields Reply

    October 24, 2013 at 6:44 pm

    This logic only makes sense to those that have not made it into the 21st century. By the way, panic mongers, has anyone come to collect YOUR weapon yet?

    • Litmus Failure Reply

      November 5, 2013 at 8:47 am

      • IGotBupkis, "'Faeces Evenio', Mr. Holder?" Reply

        November 28, 2013 at 4:17 am

        Stop trying to confuse the boy with FACTS and EVIDENCE. He’s got an axe to grind, and it’s not even smaller than his fist yet.

    • Charles Fillinger Reply

      December 7, 2013 at 9:24 pm

      If you live in New York City, the police have issued letters to registered gun owners to surrender weapons outlawed by the latest edict or “else” they will be forced to confiscate them. Not so far off for New Yorkers.

    • biff taner Reply

      December 10, 2013 at 9:21 pm

      No , but should people wait to speak until they do? I don’t believe it will ever happen mostly because of the so called gun nuts who consistently speak up. I do believe that if nobody spoke out about the subject the government would take away your guns and rightfully so since they obviously meant little to you.

  40. M. Foley Reply

    October 11, 2013 at 9:52 am

    I wonder if this were to happen today, are we all prepared psychologically to act in this same manner? We talk about it all the time, but if it came right down to it, are we really brave enough to die over our right to bear arms? Each man should be able to know without any hesitation the answer to this or else stay out of the fight. We must be willing to kill or be killed. It is an awful big step to take. Some just won’t be able to handle it. We are very close to being right back when this actually took place, and against a much stronger enemy now. Can you really do it?

    • IGotBupkis, "'Faeces Evenio', Mr. Holder?" Reply

      November 28, 2013 at 4:21 am

      }}} We are very close to being right back when this actually took place, and against a much stronger enemy now.

      I will grant you the proximity issue, but “stronger”, no. They are a lot of cowards hiding behind mercenaries. The US military won’t side with them, take illegal orders from them, and most won’t fire on US citizens justifiably incensed at government actions.

      So that leaves them with mostly their paramilitary forces, who are vastly outnumbered and aren’t about to stick their heads out for politicians’ benefit when they are getting their heads blown off.

  41. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! - Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - City-Data Forum

  42. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! | OneSquareLight

  43. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! | What Would The Founders Think?

  44. Don A Reply

    September 5, 2013 at 11:17 am

    Wow, sounds like the story that was broadcast on radio in Oct, 1938 by H.G.Wells, War of the Worlds. People actually believed we were getting invaded by martians.
    Wonder how many people reading this knows what I’m talking about. I only say this because it is true that most Americans know so little of our country’s history that they shouldn’t even qualify for American citizenship, let alone have an opinion of it.

  45. chan45 Reply

    August 26, 2013 at 8:39 am

    iwass there in july 4th 1776!!!

  46. Pingback: Seventy-two killed resisting gun confiscation in Boston! | Prepper Podcast Radio Network

  47. Pingback: A Weekend Tab Clearing | My Blog

  48. aidders Reply

    August 5, 2013 at 4:27 pm

    Wow, did anyone actually read the article that was referring to an incident in 1775!! And not just the other day!!

    Knowledge or should I say; an headline full of it, is a dangerous thing to many and in which these comments reflect. – Dam, no wonder you believe the official version of 9/11! Yeah, well what about building 7?

    Whilst on the subject; have you seen – http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/never-seen-before-evidence-9-11-the-hidden-airport-masonic

    Please don’t just watch the video – “read” the article before commenting!!

    • JBnID Reply

      October 17, 2013 at 10:12 am

      I recognized the names and circumstances in the first couple of sentences. You didn’t?
      That shows a lack of historical knowledge.

      • AC Reply

        October 25, 2013 at 2:22 pm

        I would guess that the average American doesn’t know who the governor of Massachusetts is now or 1775. That doesn’t show a lack of historical knowledge.

        The circumstances are a different matter, but calling someone out for not knowing the governor of Mass in 1775 makes you look just as, if not more, ignorant.

        • IGotBupkis, "'Faeces Evenio', Mr. Holder?" Reply

          November 28, 2013 at 4:28 am

          }}} Dam, no wonder you believe the official version of 9/11! Yeah, well what about building 7?

          Dude, just STFU with the 911 truther shit. You make everyone else look stupid.

          I have vastly more understanding of mathematics, physics, architecture, AND engineering than you do, okay?

          The ones telling you it was anything but exactly what it was — terrorists flying planes into buildings — are either as scientifically illiterate and clueless as you, repeating hare-brained theories from someone else — or quacks and charlatans no better than Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, just with a different bill of goods.

          If someone was going to advance a theory that it was ALLOWED to happen, THAT might be possible. But the fact is, the whole “demolition” theory is just ignorant and retarded beyond measure. You’re not just wrong, you’re so wrong you don’t even grasp how wrong you are.

          • Cassie Reply

            December 4, 2013 at 8:30 pm

            You mean like standing in the hall of the National Security Agency, near their library, and in the Weapons & Space Directorate area, 2 days after 9/11 and listening to an intelligence analyst sobbing (and shaking), saying, “We told them over and over again for months that this would happen, but our bosses refused to let us report it! We could have saved all those people, but we were told to shut the hell up or we would be fired!” You mean, something like that to advance the “theory” that it was allowed to happen?

          • ...... your wrong Reply

            December 5, 2013 at 1:03 pm

            I have worked in a foundry for 10+ years. I dont have any fancy degree’s i have a high school deploma. But i can tell you with 100% certanty that fire proofed hardened steel will not melt untill 3000 degrees f or even become unstable untill 2000-2650 degrees f. Now they say that the fire burning in the world trade center was burning at 2000 and a compeletly seperate building was also brought down by a fire that was no fed by jet fule. Sorry but with my knowlage on how metal melts which is my job to know such things i have to strongly disagree. I am also not afraid to say how i have recevied this knowlage as u are sense u just say u know such things with out saying where and when u recieved such know how. I have my ten year at jencast foundy in south coffeyville kansas where i have been the lead furnace operator for 8 of my ten years. Again its my job know know how metals break down and we leave our furnaces at 2000 degrees overnight and yed the steel does get a nice red glow to it but it is still hard as steel and its not covered in fireproof material as the steel on he world trade center towers were. I wrote this on my phone please excuse any typos.

          • Wayne Caviness Reply

            March 12, 2014 at 1:21 am

            I don’t claim to know what happened on 9/11 I wasn’t there. It wasn’t but a few years ago I was just like you. I thought these people were nuts. Yes some of them are a little off.

            What most people fail to realize is the Truther movement was started by family members of that horrible days victims, as well as a few that survived. They were simply asking for a real investigation.

            I remember that day as clear as a bell and I rallied behind Bush as he pushed his way into Iraq and then Afghanistan. It wasn’t until a few years after Obama came into office that I began researching to see why so many hated Obama. I felt that most were simply being racist and I’m still believing that is most peoples true motives that don’t like him. They don’t like him because he’s black or because he’s a Muslim.

            They believe he is out to destroy our country, and what I’ve found he is doing a pretty good job. He’s added more debt than all others combined and has contributed to the continuity of shredding our Constitution and the sovereignty of our nation. I am assuming that you aren’t one of those that believe our Constitution isn’t an outdated piece of paper. If so, I’m wasting my time here and still may be.

            Now I understand that there are all kinds of crazy claims out there.
            Some that try and tell us there were no planes that hit the twin towers as an example of one. But if you actually dig through some of the video clips and look at the real news clips that were shown only once, you’ll find that there were tons of witnesses on explosions before the planes ever hit. These witnesses range from news reporters, firemen, to actual survivors that were in the buildings.

            I know that the 9/11 commission supposedly did an investigation. However, I find it strange that our government spent so much money on the Clinton Sex Scandal and so little on the 9/11 investigation. Regardless of how much was spent, Bush blocked any real investigation. This is now admitted by members of the 9/11 commission. What was Bush afraid of that he wouldn’t testify under oath and also refused to let it be transcribed? Why not just plead the 5th? Seems a little bit like what the Obama Administration is doing today with each scandal that comes out. Fast and Furious, IRS, Benghazi and the list goes on.

            I never dreamed that looking into Obama would reveal so many things that I never knew about our government.

            What really puzzles me about 9/11 is how a few Muslims could hijack 4 planes and hit 3 targets without the aid of navigation from ATC and get past NORCOM with 4 planes on that day. NORCOM had a 100% success rate up until that day. I also find it interesting that a NORCOM procedures were changed not to long before the attacks. Why was Vice President Cheney being asked if the orders still stood when the plane was 50 miles, 30 miles, 10 miles from the Pentagon and stated of course the orders still stand have you heard any different. While all of this is going on our President remains calm in a classroom.

            You say what about building 7? To begin with how many know about building 7? I didn’t know as most of the people I talk to don’t. You realize it wasn’t hit by a plane and it collapsed in the same manner as the twin towers right. There were some small fires and and slight damage to one corner. Building 7 had been evacuated earlier that morning, yet Silverstien stated to pull it and then they watched it collapse. I guess that was a huge coincidence. An even bigger coincidence is how he had leased the WTC complex shortly before the attacks. Of course, he’s going to carry insurance and obviously he made over 3 Billion on each plane that hit. The mayor of NY at the time, I forget his name apparently didn’t feel that his bunker was safe within building 7. Are these people really nuts for asking questions and wanting a real investigation?

            FEMA had arrived the night before the attack for a drill in NY. While most of the ranking FBI members were conveniently grounded in Cali. since all air traffic was suspended. Why was the debris from the WTC Complex shipped out so quickly? Why were there hotspots in the debris that reached temperatures above jetfuel fire temps months after the attack? The list goes on and on.

            Everything I talked about and much more is video documented on YouTube. Not just some story written up by some conspiracy nut.

            After learning of our governments and others, history of False Flags. I’m talking declassified documents, I find it hard to believe that more Americans aren’t questioning the Government. I guess it’s because most people have no idea like me what a False Flag Operation is.

            So I guess when our government tells us Santa Claus is real, we’ll all just sit and think we were bad kids as each Christmas passes. Sounds a little ridiculous, but it’s not far from the truth. I am guilty myself and I find it a little embarrassing that I failed to ask questions and just went along with it because that’s what they told me. Similar to you telling someone to sit down and shut up, because you don’t like what they are saying. I’m not at all saying that it didn’t happen, I do have questions. Label me whatever you like…

  49. Freedom Reply

    July 18, 2013 at 7:41 pm

    The Boston Massacre: America the Story of Us and how The American Revolution began

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iloGkp5f_Hk

    Crispus Attucks (1723-1770) Portrait of Crispus Attucks Remembered as the “First to Die in the American Revolution”

    http://www.framingham.com/history/profiles/crispus/

    Portion of trial documents in the case of the murder of Crispus Attucks.

    http://www.framingham.com/history/profiles/crispus/trial.htm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *